Kapteyn’s Star: Difference between revisions
IanRidpath (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Authors: {{PAGEAUTHORS}} | |||
---- | |||
Modern name for HD 33793 = GJ 191, a high proper motion M1 subdwarf at d=4pc (V=8.8) in [[Pictor]]. The star was unusual – very blue but M1 type, high pm and very high radial velocity (242 km/s). Two recent exoplanet candidates reported (Anglada-Escude+2014) but both have been rebutted (Bortles+2021). | Modern name for HD 33793 = GJ 191, a high proper motion M1 subdwarf at d=4pc (V=8.8) in [[Pictor]]. The star was unusual – very blue but M1 type, high pm and very high radial velocity (242 km/s). Two recent exoplanet candidates reported (Anglada-Escude+2014) but both have been rebutted (Bortles+2021). | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == | ||
[[Category:Asterism]] | |||
[[Category:Star Name]] | [[Category:Star Name]] | ||
[[Category:Eurasia]] | [[Category:Eurasia]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:58, 24 May 2026
Authors: Eric Mamajek, Susanne M Hoffmann, Youla Azkarrula
Modern name for HD 33793 = GJ 191, a high proper motion M1 subdwarf at d=4pc (V=8.8) in Pictor. The star was unusual – very blue but M1 type, high pm and very high radial velocity (242 km/s). Two recent exoplanet candidates reported (Anglada-Escude+2014) but both have been rebutted (Bortles+2021).
Etymology and History

This was 2nd-highest proper motion star in 1927 according to Luyten and still is! (8.7”/yr). It was pointed out as highest proper motion (at time) by Kapteyn (1897) “Stern mit grösster bislang bekannter Eigenbewegung” (“Star with largest self-motion known to date”)

The name appears to be from Luyten (1927) “Note on the Magnitude and Spectrum of Kapteyn's Star”.
- "Kapteyn" in Allen (1963; Astrophysical Quantities),
- "Kapteyn's Star" in Rhoads (1971),
- Burnham (1978),
- Fernandez+(1983),
- Sinnott & Perryman Millenium Atlas (1997),
- Cox (2000; Astrophysical Quantities),
- Kaler (2006).
- NASA ADS shows “Kapteyn’s star” listed in 44 abstracts
- Name is already in SIMBAD. Wikipedia
Mythology
IAU Star Name
WGSN discussed the name in 2022 but decided (for the time being) not to name stars after people.





